|
_
Dear Governor Owens and other Distinguished Persons,
I have watched this travesty unfold all summer, hoping that someone at
the higher levels of state government would wake up and come to their
senses, but I can stay silent no longer. I would like to address the
terrible situation that is going on regarding the demise of the Georgetown
Loop Railroad.
I have been around railroads all of my 46 years, as I was born to
parents that met while working on a railroad in Pennsylvania. I have been on
too many tourist trains to count. I have worked for 9 years on a steam
tourist railroad in Pennsylvania before moving to Colorado almost 5 years
ago. I have followed the tourist railroad industry very closely over the
years. I am also a degreed mechanical engineer with some business education.
That said, I would like to address a few points:
1 - The Georgetown Loop Railroad was one of the finest tourist railroads I
have ever seen. Other than the Durango & Silverton line, to the best of my
knowledge there is no other place that can boast having three operating
steam locomotives. Three locomotives that are in excellent physical shape
and appearance for their ages. Definitely a first class operation. Trust me
when I say the outgoing operators of the Georgetown Loop Railroad are very
well known throughout the railroad community and thought of very highly. If
you won't trust me, just call around the country to any number of tourist
railroads, and see what they say about the outgoing operators. Why do you
think the Historical Society only got one semi-legitimate bid? No one of any
serious reputation in the railroad tourist industry bid on the RFP because
they knew there was no decent equipment available to run on the Georgetown
Loop! Then, when the bids were obviously not up to the requirements of the
RFP, the Georgetown Loop Railroad tried to resume negotiation, but was
rebuffed by the Historical Society.
2 - The Georgetown Loop Railroad track and cars were maintained in excellent
condition, especially when you consider the age of the cars and track.
Narrow gauge track is more difficult to maintain and provide a smooth ride
than standard gauge track. Given the relatively slow speeds at which the
Georgetown Loop trains traveled, they could have taken short cuts with the
track and the cars, but they chose not to. They could have scrimped on ties
and spikes, but they didn't. they could have scrimped on ballast, but they
didn't. Just look at what George Bartholomew did to the Cumbres & Toltec
roadbed under his tenure. They had to throw him out for neglect of the
property! The Georgetown Loop Railroad took excellent care of the property
right up to the end.
3 - Safety. Some tourist railroads have no formal training programs for
their employees, and safety is very questionable. With a minimal amount of
supervision and observation, people are given jobs where passenger lives are
at stake. At some railroads, a person can make engineer in less than a year!
Then there are railroads like the Georgetown Loop, where the employees are
obviously well trained, and have to work jobs for a long time before they
advance to the next position. From what I have seen, the staff at Georgetown
excelled in their jobs, and their safety record is shows it.
4 - Safety. Yes, I have Safety here twice. Steam locomotives can be a very
dangerous thing. Just do a little research into steam locomotive boiler
explosions, and you will quickly find out that improperly maintained and
inspected locomotive boilers can be deadly, with explosions throwing the
boilers over 200 feet through the air, killing anyone within that distance.
Based on a 1995 boiler explosion on the Gettysburg Railroad, the Federal
Railroad Administration rewrote and updated the rules regarding steam
locomotive boilers. I am very familiar with the Gettysburg incident, as I
was a steam locomotive fireman on another PA tourist line at the time. The
Gettysburg crew was lucky in that they all survived. Two had broken bones,
cuts, and 2nd and 3rd degree burns. The engineer, suffered no broken bones,
but he did have 3rd degree burns over 65% of his body. No passengers were
injured and the boiler did not leave the locomotive. The NTSB report is
available online. I will not get within 200 feet of a CHS or Railstar
refurbished steam locomotive, nor will I allow my family to do the same. I
will recommend that friends stay away, also. The risk is too high, because
neither the Colorado Historical Society or Railstar has demonstrated the
necessary skills of properly maintaining and inspecting steam locomotive
boilers long term. The Georgetown Loop Railroad had over 30 years of safe
boiler operation.
5 - Safety. Again. For a third time. I cannot stress this enough. In regards
to the rotting drop bottom gondolas that the CHS has purchased from Durango
for use on Georgetown Loop trains in 2005, they will need to be totally
stripped down and rebuilt so that they are no longer drop bottom gondola
cars, otherwise they cannot safely carry people. Again, this flies in the
face of the history that the Historical Society is supposed to protect. This
whole thing with the Historical Society and the Georgetown Loop Railroad
will destroy far more Colorado Railroad history than it will preserve. To
think that the Historical Society has the nerve to call the operator of the
Georgetown Loop "anti-preservationist"!
6 - There are no 3 foot gauge steam locomotives in good operable condition
available for sale, and there are very few 3 foot gauge diesels available
for sale. Anywhere. All are being used. There are very few 3 foot gauge cars
available that can haul passengers. The Cumbres and Toltec Scenic Railroad
is undergoing a massive and prolonged steam locomotive rebuilding program
which has been brought about by the new FRA regulations. In reports that I
have seen, they are budgeting $600,000 per locomotive to bring them up to
Federal code. These are locomotives that have been in service relatively
recently. The locomotives that the Colorado Historical Society is proposing
to use have not run in over 40 years, and the boilers are of a type frowned
upon by the FRA. As a result, the lightweight locomotives being considered
will need to be either de-rated of have new boilers built. A new boiler does
not exactly fit the preservation goals of the CHS. You may have noticed that
I mentioned lightweight in regards to the locomotives proposed. That is
because steam locomotives of the size and power used by the Cumbres &
Toltec, or the Durango & Silverton, cannot negotiate the curves of the
Georgetown Loop Railroad. Even Georgetown Loop RR #40, which is about the
largest rod-type steam locomotive that can run on the Georgetown Loop, can
only haul about 40% of what the Georgetown Loop RR shay locomotives can
haul. That amounts to 1 coach, an open gondola car, a refurbished cattle
care, and a caboose or two. The passenger capacity of such a train is in the
ballpark of 100-120 people, well below what the regular Georgetown Loop
trains haul with their shays, which is more like 360-400 people. By the way,
there are no 3 foot gauge shay locomotives available for sale to my
knowledge, and even if Railstar can find one steam rod-type locomotive and
some cars, the best they can haul passenger-wise will be around 1/3 of what
the Georgetown Loop Railroad has been carrying. That number is around
130,000 people this year, and can be expected to drop below 42,900 people
for 2005. IF Railstar and the Historical Society can come up with a train at
all. If not, then the number drops to zero passengers.
I would not want to be a businessman in Georgetown next year, when there
will be at least 87,100 fewer tourists (and possibly 130,000 fewer) because
of the lack of train equipment.
No matter how you look at it, and no matter how you twist the numbers
around, changing operators at the Georgetown Loop Railroad makes no
financial sense. Two steam locomotive rebuilds will cost the state of
Colorado at least $1.2 million dollars (and maybe as high as $2 million),
and every time estimate I have heard indicates at least 1 year of time per
locomotive. That takes us to fall of 2005 before any steam locomotive can be
ready for use. Then you have to factor in the cost to rebuild cars. If you
could get them done for $25,000 each, to do 10 cars and be close to the
current passenger capacity would require and other $250,000. Money that the
state of Colorado does not have, or so I keep hearing. Therefore, the
Historical Society is going to spend anywhere from $1.45 million to $2.25
million to fix something that was not broken! Never mind the lost tax
revenues and closed Georgetown businesses. If I had made such bad business
decisions during my career as the Historical Society has made in regards to
the Georgetown Loop, I would have been fired, at the very least.
The only explanation I can see why this can be happening to the good
taxpaying people and businesses of Georgetown, and the taxpayers of all of
Colorado, is a political agenda. Such an agenda has been well documented, so
I don't need to rehash it here. It is an agenda that is being swept under
the carpet by the Historical Society when they refuse to truthfully answer
questions as to how this all came to be. No matter how many banners the
Historical Society puts up proclaiming that the train will run in 2005, and
no matter how many press conferences they hold stating the same thing, the
Historical Society still cannot show anyone the train. That is because there
is no train once it leaves the Georgetown Loop property in the next few
weeks!
Thank you for your time.
Best Regards,
Randy Buchter
801 Alpine Street
Longmont, CO 80501
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Honorable Governor Owens,
I have written to you previously about the Georgetown Loop Railroad, but I am writing again to ask you to please launch an investigation into why the Colorado Historical Society is refusing to negotiate with the Georgetown Loop Railroad, Inc. (current operator or the railroad).
The Ashby/Greksa family has done an outstanding job of operating the Georgetown Loop Railroad for 30 years. No other organization could ever match the quality of operation provided by Georgetown Loop Railroad, Inc. The accuracy of the historical experience offered to visitors is unequaled anywhere. The current operators of the railroad have provided equipment that is maintained safely and is also historically accurate. The employees of the Georgetown Loop Railroad excel in providing a safe and enjoyable experience for the visitor.
Thanks to the Ashby/Greksa families many years of fine operation of the railroad, visitors to Colorado and Coloradoans have had the privilege of enjoying an historical treasure. I sincerely believe there is some state employee that has an underlying grudge and ugly political reason for not renewing their contract. If the contract is not renewed, I have serious doubt that the Colorado Historical Society will ever offer such an outstanding and pleasant historical experience at the Georgetown Loop ever again.
I am also concerned that the CHS's efforts to acquire equipment are gravely flawed. The locomotives they are considering having restored may have serious problems that can only be corrected with a great deal of money, time and effort. Even if they do restore and operate this historic equipment, I am concerned that they will run these locomotives into the ground and we will loose them forever. The fact that Engine #9 sat on a siding up in Silver Plume and rotted for many years is proof that CHS doesn't care about preserving our historical equipment. Engine #9 should have been cosmetically preserved many, many years ago. It is too small a locomotive to pull the longer trains on the Loop.
Please launch an investigation into this matter. The Colorado Historical Society is making foolish decisions that are not in the best interest of the citizens of Colorado nor taxpayers.
Sincerely,
Alan Davis
Loveland, CO
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
The People of Georgetown
1-I think that you should look what happened to thr Heber Valley in Utah when
the Heber Creeper shutdown in 1990.
The Valley suffered a very substanial HIT, that only recently has it regained
those losses by becoming a Rich Man's Suburb of Park City, Utah, and the
Heber Valley Railroad struggles on with Ridership still not reaching pre 1990
Levels.
2-The shutdown of the Sierra Railroad in Jamestown California in 1979 has
effected thsat operation, and now due to many unstable variables has become a
Static Museum with a short train ride.
The CHS and Associates appear to want dump all of the Costs of Maintaining
the Railroad and Lebanon Mine onto the Georgetown Loop Railroad or whom ever
that they find, and to also require Insurance coverage that is beyond anyone's
Grasp.
This indicates some interesting Questions????
1-Is the CHS and Associates attempting to take over the Georgetown Loop as a
Division of the CHS and run it as such---A very Risky and Expensive Option as
State Employment Requirements would be extremely Costly.
2-The CHS and Associates have a Plan to Assume control of the Railroad and
lease it out to a Friend of the CHS.
This can look like a Good Option, but it has some inherent pitfalls in that
the CHS woold be in a position to circumvent some of the Safety Factors of the
present system (This by no means detracts from the CHS, but is a situation
that has happened here in Utah-Where the State Parks were extremely lax in
managing their Duties dealing with the Heber Creeper and the resulting problems).
3-The costs and problems associated with the change are signifigant
-# 9 Rebuild will likely cost in excess of $600,000 after all of the known
and unknown required repairs are done.
-The use of the worn out Boxcar Coaches from the Cumbres and Toltec are
another expense as given the work required to refurbish several of the cars back to
Freight Cars (according to Friend's Pictures most required a removal of the
Car Structure down to the frame and a complete new Body.
-Acquiring a Diesel Locomotive of the size required as a backup is not going
to be easy or cheap, as most of the existing narrow gauge diesel locomotives
are mainly 25 tons or less, and the only real set of locomotive available were
recently scrapped by the Larry's Truck Equipment Company in Ohio for parts.
The Diesel Locomotive Requirements are basically a two truck, 300 hp min. no
less that 4 ton, and air brake equipped.
-Steam Locomotive Requirements are thet there be a minimum of two and
preferably three steam locomotive of a size capable of moving six to eight passenger
carrying cars per train.
-Passenger Cars are a very great requirement, and for Georgetown Loop
Operations there is a basic requirement of 12 passenger cars (This allows for cars to
be in Train Service, Spares for running replacements, and Cars in the Shop
for maintenance and repairs)
The CHS and Associates have so far been too secretive to give in My view any
real security.
I must also give another view, and that is that the Rails to Trails may be
Making an Attempt to create the Georgetown Loop Bike Trail...
I was unable to ride the Georgetown Loop Railroad in 1998 and 2000 due to the
limited access and very limited AUTO parking due to the large amount of
business, which saddened me.
I remember talking to some people a number of years ago about the Georgetwon
Loop Railroad, and how frustrating it was to have such a large number of autos
passing thru the Georgetown Neighborhoods and still not able to access
Downtown Georgetown after riding the Train.
A solution to this would be to extend the GLRR east to the Western Edge of
Georgetown Lake, which would allow a large and more accessible auto parking
area, an area for a much larger Rail Shop Area, and Museum Display Buildings and
Openair Display.
The downtown Access could be a seasonal either rubber tired street car or a
rail streetcar using batteries or a diesel-electric power system (ie the Platte
River Trolley in Denver).
I see the outlook of the Georgetown Loop Railroad surviving past Sept. 2005
as Slim, and the Georgetown Loop Historic District Bike and Hike Trail looming
in the near future.
The Train can Draw from reports as many as 115,000 Visitors, and the Trail
maybe 15,000 Visitors.
The People of Georgetown, Silver Plume and the adjacent areas and Communities
must decide where the future is going to head, as the past has shown that
even a one year shutdown can reduce the Train Ridership by as much 80 percent,
and once lost it is very, very hard to regain.
The CHS given the current Colorado Funding Problems maybe seeking to dump
most of the costs of the Historic District onto the Operator of the Train and
onto the towns of Georgetown and Silver Plume as a way of reducing CHS General
Costs.
This is another possible reason why.
There are numerous Senarios that can be developed, but any Solutions will
require the Participation and Decision Making, and possibly including Georgetown
and the adjacent Communities setting up a Special District and assuming the
total control from the CHs to preserve what is there now versus a poor looking
future.
Sincerely
Stephen Smith
Bar-S Bar Research
Ogden, Utah
|
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Sir,
I am writing to save the Georgetown loop as it is currently operating. It is
the reason I venture to Georgetown after visting Durango and Antinito. I
also recommend the Georgetown loop to friends that are viisting Colo. Please
keep this great operation going.
Thank You,
Randy James
1413 Grimes Dr.
Carrollton Texas 75010
|
_________________________________________________________________________________________
To whomever is considering the notion of closing the Georgetown Loop Railroad:
ARE YOU PEOPLE CRAZY?
This is a piece of history that doesn't just set there on a shelf or is a two
dimensional picture in a book. It's real! It works! It's up close and
personal! All your senses can experience it! You can touch it, hear it and smell
it! A historical experience like this is something to be treasured and
protected. Add that closing one of the best tourist attractions and engineering
wonders of the US will be signing a death warrant to those two wonderful towns.
No one will stop there anymore. They will just continue on into Denver. The
quaint little shops and restaurants will have to shut down and those
dependent on the cash flow from those businesses will have to leave. There are enough
dried up ghost towns and far too much history being lost for you to let this
happen!
Closing this railroad or any other historical attraction down IS comparable
to piloting a plane into the world trade center!
Sincerely,
Ward Hammond
Houston, TX
|
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Mr. Hammond-
Thank you for your interest and concern in the Georgetown Loop Historic
Railroad and Mining Park issue.
The Georgetown Loop Railroad is very important to the Colorado Historical
Society. As you say, it is an historical experience to be treasured. We
treasure the memories of children and families who experience this piece of
Colorado history each year. As a result, we are committee to ensuring that
the railroad runs for many years to come.
are attached. I hope that these will address some of the questions you have.
Thank you again for your interest and concern.
Sincerely,
Julie A. Wedding
Public Relations Director
Colorado Historical Society
1300 Broadway
Denver, Colorado 80203
(303) 866-3670
julie.wedding@chs.state.co.us
Check out our Web site at www.coloradohistory.org
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It is indeed a crying shame to see such a historical item as the Gerogetown
Loop Railroad shut down, particularly in light of the incredible efforts over
so many years to get the Devil's Gate bridge and the railroad rebuilt to
operating condition after so many years of being shut down.
It would be helpful to us in the railroad community to have some insight as
to the problems that are evident between the Colorado Historical Society and
the GLRR. There was a similar instance a couple of years ago on the Cumbres and
Toltec where problems existed betwene the owners and the operator of the
railroad. Through monumental efforts by may parties the railroad was saved for
future generations to the benefit of all.
Not having any informaton as to the reasons for the shutdown one can only
assume there is some sort of grudge match going on between the parties. Poor
reasons indeed to lose such a valuable historical artifact.
Brian Banks
Ponca City, Oklahoma
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Good Evening,
It has come to the attention of many Colorado RailFans, who in turn, become
regular tourists in the great State of Colorado, some of which making annual
visits... that the Colorado Historical Society and the Georgetown Loop
Railroad will part company at the end of the 2004 season.
I can assure you that, my reasons for visiting the Georgetown and Idaho
Springs area will all but end, with the lack of this railroad operations.
And with the obvious lack of options for another Railroad Firm to replace
the GLRR Co, with such unique equipment, I do not see this line recovering
from this loss.
It is my hopes, as with many, that the two parties can come to an agreement,
meet in the middle, figure SOMETHING OUT and continue the wonderful
operation of the great piece of Colorado History. For those that have not
seen the video showing the original railroad and then showing its
reconstruction, I urge them to watch the video again. Then ask, if they
wish to be a part of the end of this tourist operation, or part of the
on-going life of this operation. Its as simple as that question.
sincerely,
Frolin Marek & family
San Antonio, Texas
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
To Whom It May Concern:
Why is George Town Loop running is to be discontinued???????????
Why?
I have read about rebuild the span to complete the high bridge 30 years ago
but now the bad news.
I have not able to be there yet but planning in a year or two.
My heart sank when I read the update about last run in October 2004.
Thank you.
Sojourner for Christ, Jerry
|